Discussion:
extended filesystems
Bill Cunningham
2014-08-17 19:52:46 UTC
Permalink
I would like to start experiemnting with the ext filesystems. I might
like one day to develop something. :) What files contain the ext4
filesystem. That's what I'm running right now. I like ext 2/3/4 all of them.

My fedora partition is only 20 GB in size. I don't need huge filesystem
support which is a feature of ext4 I believe. Which feature can I remove to
remove this feature? I know it would be done with tune2fs -O ^ and then the
feature name.

Why would I want to do this. to learn and I don't think I need it. Too
much overhead.

Bill
Eric Sandeen
2014-08-17 20:47:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Cunningham
I would like to start experiemnting with the ext filesystems. I might
like one day to develop something. :) What files contain the ext4
filesystem. That's what I'm running right now. I like ext 2/3/4 all of them.
fs/ext4/*.[ch]
fs/jbd2/*.[ch]

in the linux kernel source tree.
Post by Bill Cunningham
My fedora partition is only 20 GB in size. I don't need huge filesystem
support which is a feature of ext4 I believe. Which feature can I remove to
remove this feature? I know it would be done with tune2fs -O ^ and then the
feature name.
Reading the tune2fs man page would be a start...
Post by Bill Cunningham
Why would I want to do this. to learn and I don't think I need it. Too
much overhead.
The only feature unique to "huge filesystems" is the 64bit feature, and
it's not used by default on a small filesystem; it also cannot be added or
removed with tune2fs after the fact.

So the first thing you've learned is that it is not in fact too much
overhead, because it's not there. ;)

-Eric
Bill Cunningham
2014-08-18 17:33:02 UTC
Permalink
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Sandeen" <***@redhat.com>
To: "Bill Cunningham" <***@suddenlink.net>; <Ext3-***@redhat.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: extended filesystems

[snip]
Post by Eric Sandeen
So the first thing you've learned is that it is not in fact too much
overhead, because it's not there. ;)
-Eric
Ok I see. Well I have used fsarchiver to save my ext4 system and the
mkfs option to uninstall everything as an ext2 filesystem. Everything
uncompress and is written to the block device much more quickly. I know with
ext3 there is the journal inode which isn't present on ext2.

Well anyway is this list for the entire ext family or just ext3?

Bill
Eric Sandeen
2014-08-18 17:34:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Cunningham
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: extended filesystems
[snip]
Post by Eric Sandeen
So the first thing you've learned is that it is not in fact too much
overhead, because it's not there. ;)
-Eric
Ok I see. Well I have used fsarchiver to save my ext4 system and the mkfs option to uninstall everything as an ext2 filesystem. Everything uncompress and is written to the block device much more quickly. I know with ext3 there is the journal inode which isn't present on ext2.
Well anyway is this list for the entire ext family or just ext3?
Bill
linux-***@vger.kernel.org is the list for all of them. ext3-users isn't used much.

-Eric

Loading...